Quadrupole-hexadecapole correlations in neutron-rich samarium and gadolinium isotopes

TL;DR

This study investigates quadrupole-hexadecapole correlations in neutron-rich samarium and gadolinium isotopes using a combination of energy density functional theory and the interacting boson model, revealing significant hexadecapole effects in lighter isotopes.

Contribution

It introduces a microscopic mapping of the Gogny-EDF onto the $sdg$-IBM, demonstrating improved spectroscopic predictions and highlighting the importance of hexadecapole correlations in certain nuclei.

Findings

The $sdg$-IBM reproduces experimental spectra well.

Hexadecapole correlations are significant in lighter isotopes.

Hexadecapole effects are minor for nuclei with $N \,\geq\, 94$.

Abstract

We present an extensive study of quadrupole-hexadecapole correlation effects in even-even Sm and Gd isotopes with neutron number $N=88-106$. The calculations are performed in the framework of the Gogny energy density functional (EDF) with the D1S parametrization and the $sdg$ interacting boson model (IBM). The quadrupole-hexadecapole constrained self-consistent mean-field potential energy surface is mapped onto the expectation value of the $sdg$-boson Hamiltonian. This procedure determines the parameters of the $sdg$-IBM Hamiltonian microscopically. Calculated excitation energies and transition strengths are compared to the ones obtained with a simpler $sd$-IBM, as well as with the experimental data. The Gogny-EDF mapped $sdg$-IBM reproduces spectroscopic properties of the studied nuclei as reasonably as in the case of the previous $sdg$-boson mapping calculations that were based on the relativistic EDF, indicating that the axial quadrupole-hexadecapole method is sound regardless of whether relativistic or nonrelativistic EDF is employed. The mapped $sdg$-IBM improves some of the results in lighter Sm and Gd isotopes compared to the mapped $sd$-IBM, implying the existence of significant hexadecapole correlations in those nuclei. For those nuclei with $N \geq 94$, hexadecapole effects are minor, and the only significant difference between the two boson models can be found in the description of $E0$ monopole transitions.