Pluralistic Alignment Over Time
Toryn Q. Klassen, Parand A. Alamdari, Sheila A. McIlraith

TL;DR
This paper discusses the importance of evaluating AI alignment over time, considering changing stakeholder preferences and satisfaction, and proposes applying fairness evaluation methods to achieve temporal pluralism in AI systems.
Contribution
It introduces the concept of temporal pluralism, advocating for AI systems to adapt to stakeholders' evolving values and preferences over time.
Findings
Proposes applying fairness over time to pluralistic alignment
Highlights the need to consider changing stakeholder satisfaction
Suggests a framework for temporal adaptation in AI alignment
Abstract
If an AI system makes decisions over time, how should we evaluate how aligned it is with a group of stakeholders (who may have conflicting values and preferences)? In this position paper, we advocate for consideration of temporal aspects including stakeholders' changing levels of satisfaction and their possibly temporally extended preferences. We suggest how a recent approach to evaluating fairness over time could be applied to a new form of pluralistic alignment: temporal pluralism, where the AI system reflects different stakeholders' values at different times.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEthics and Social Impacts of AI · Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) · Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems
