Analysis of the SUPG Method for the Solution of Optimal Control Problems
S. Scott Collis, Matthias Heinkenschloss

TL;DR
This paper compares two numerical approaches for solving optimal control problems governed by advection-diffusion equations using the SUPG finite element method, analyzing their error estimates and convergence properties.
Contribution
It provides theoretical error estimates and convergence analysis for both discretize-then-optimize and optimize-then-discretize approaches with SUPG, highlighting their differences.
Findings
Optimize-then-discretize has better asymptotic convergence with higher-order elements.
For linear elements, convergence is similar except in zero diffusion limit.
Numerical examples confirm theoretical error estimates.
Abstract
We study the effect of the streamline upwind/Petrov Galerkin (SUPG) stabilized finite element method on the discretization of optimal control problems governed by linear advection-diffusion equations. We compare two approaches for the numerical solution of such optimal control problems. In the discretize-then-optimize approach, the optimal control problem is first discretized, using the SUPG method for the discretization of the advection-diffusion equation, and then the resulting finite dimensional optimization problem is solved. In the optimize-then-discretize approach one first computes the infinite dimensional optimality system, involving the advection-diffusion equation as well as the adjoint advection-diffusion equation, and then discretizes this optimality system using the SUPG method for both the original and the adjoint equations. These approaches lead to different results. The…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAerospace Engineering and Control Systems
