Stationary Reflection and the Failure OF SCH at $\aleph_{\omega_1}$
Tom Benhamou, Dima Sinapova

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates the consistency of stationary reflection at l_{41} with the failure of the Singular Cardinal Hypothesis, using large cardinal assumptions to combine these seemingly contradictory properties.
Contribution
It proves, from uncountably many supercompact cardinals, that l_{41} can be a strong limit with a large power set, while stationary sets reflect, answering a longstanding open question.
Findings
l_{41} can be strong limit with _{41}+1 power set.
Stationary reflection can coexist with the failure of SCH at l_{41}.
Consistency results based on large cardinal assumptions.
Abstract
Combining stationary reflection (a compactness property) with the failure of SCH (an instance of non-compactness) has been a long-standing theme. We obtain this at , answering a question of Ben-Neria, Hayut, and Unger: We prove from the existence of uncountably many supercompact cardinals the consistency of is strong limit together with and every stationary set of reflects.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsDiverse Scientific and Economic Studies
