The Impact of Social Value Orientation on Nash Equilibria of Two Player Quadratic Games
Dan Calderone, Meeko Oishi

TL;DR
This paper analyzes how social value orientation influences Nash equilibria in two-player quadratic games, providing a detailed mathematical characterization and exploring bounded and unbounded solutions in dynamic scenarios.
Contribution
It introduces a framework for characterizing social value orientation-based Nash equilibria in quadratic games, including new analytical tools and solution bounds.
Findings
Bounded and unbounded equilibria can exist in social value orientation quadratic games.
Equilibria are characterized by eigenvalue problems and geometric intersections of ellipses.
Application demonstrated in a trajectory coordination scenario with linear time-varying dynamics.
Abstract
We consider two player quadratic games in a cooperative framework known as social value orientation, motivated by the need to account for complex interactions between humans and autonomous agents in dynamical systems. Social value orientation is a framework from psychology, that posits that each player incorporates the other player's cost into their own objective function, based on an individually pre-determined degree of cooperation. The degree of cooperation determines the weighting that a player puts on their own cost relative to the other player's cost. We characterize the Nash equilibria of two player quadratic games under social value orientation by creating expansions that elucidate the relative difference between this new equilibria (which we term the SVO-Nash equilibria) and more typical equilibria, such as the competitive Nash equilibria, individually optimal solutions, and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsExperimental Behavioral Economics Studies · Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence · Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
