Realistic outcomes of moon-moon collisions in Lunar formation theory
Uri Malamud, Hagai Perets

TL;DR
This study explores the outcomes of moon-moon collisions in lunar formation, revealing diverse collision results and emphasizing the importance of material strength in simulations, thereby supporting the multiple impact hypothesis.
Contribution
It introduces a hybrid simulation approach incorporating material strength, challenging perfect merger assumptions, and providing new insights into lunar accretion processes.
Findings
Most collisions (~90%) do not significantly erode the largest moonlet.
Inclusion of material strength affects fragmentation and ejection of material.
Higher satellite survival rates support the multiple-impact lunar formation scenario.
Abstract
The multiple impact hypothesis proposes that the Moon formed through a series of smaller collisions, rather than a single giant impact. This study advances our understanding of this hypothesis, as well as moon collisions in other contexts, by exploring the implications of these smaller impacts, employing a novel methodological approach that combines self-consistent initial conditions, hybrid hydrodynamic/N-body simulations, and the incorporation of material strength. Our findings challenge the conventional assumption of perfect mergers in previous models, revealing a spectrum of collision outcomes including partial accretion and mass loss. These outcomes are sensitive to collision parameters and Earth's tidal influence, underscoring the complex dynamics of lunar accretion. Importantly, we demonstrate that incorporating material strength is important for accurately simulating…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
