The Sylvester question in $\mathbb{R}^d$: convex sets with a flat floor

TL;DR

This paper investigates the probability that random points in convex sets with a flat floor are in convex position, proving extremal properties and providing formulas and bounds in various dimensions, thus advancing the understanding of the Sylvester problem in these contexts.

Contribution

It introduces a new model involving convex sets with a flat floor, establishes extremal results for the probability of points being in convex position, and provides explicit formulas and bounds in 2D and 3D.

Findings

Minimum probability achieved by 'mountains' with flat floor

Maximum probability can be arbitrarily close to 1

Explicit formulas and bounds for 2D and 3D cases

Abstract

Pick $n$ independent and uniform random points $U_1,\ldots,U_n$ in a compact convex set $K$ of $\mathbb{R}^d$ with volume 1, and let $P^{(d)}_K(n)$ be the probability that these points are in convex position. The Sylvester conjecture in $\mathbb{R}^d$ is that $\min_K P^{(d)}_K(d+2)$ is achieved by the $d$-dimensional simplices $K$ (only). In this paper, we focus on a companion model, already studied in the $2d$ case, which we define in any dimension $d$: we say that $K$ has $F$ as a flat floor, if $F$ is a subset of $K$, contained in a hyperplan $P$, such that $K$ lies in one of the half-spaces defined by $P$. We define $Q_K^F(n)$ as the probability that $U_1,\cdots,U_n$ together with $F$ are in convex position (i.e., the $U_i$ are on the boundary of the convex hull ${\sf CH}(\{U_1,\cdots,U_n\}\cup F\})$). We prove that, for all fixed $F$, $K\mapsto Q_K^F(2)$ reaches its minimum on the "mountains" with floor $F$ (mountains are convex hull of $F$ union an additional vertex), while the maximum is not reached, but $K\mapsto Q_K^F(2)$ has values arbitrary close to 1. If the optimisation is done on the set of $K$ contained in $F\times[0,d]$ (the "subprism case"), then the minimum is also reached by the mountains, and the maximum by the "prism" $F\times[0,1]$. Since again, $Q_K^F{(2)}$ relies on the expected volume (of ${\sf CH}(\{V_1,V_2\}\cup F\})$), this result can be seen as a proof of the Sylvester problem in the floor case. In $2d$, where $F$ can essentially be the segment $[0,1],$ we give a general decomposition formula for $Q_K^F(n)$ so to compute several formulas and bounds for different $K$. In 3D, we give some bounds for $Q_K^F(n)$ for various floors $F$ and special cases of $K$.