How Transit Countries Become Refugee Destinations: Insights from Central and Eastern Europe
Liliana Harding, Ciprian Panzaru

TL;DR
This paper investigates how refugees' destination preferences in Central and Eastern Europe, especially Romania, change during transit, influenced by safety, asylum conditions, and social networks, using mixed methods.
Contribution
It provides new insights into refugee decision-making during transit, highlighting Romania's emerging role as a settlement destination and challenging traditional transit country views.
Findings
Refugee preferences shift during transit due to safety and asylum concerns.
Romania is increasingly seen as a viable settlement destination.
Safety concerns dominate economic considerations during transit.
Abstract
This study explores how refugees' destination preferences evolve during transit, with a focus on Central and Eastern Europe, particularly Romania. Using a mixed-methods approach, we analyse data from the International Organization for Migration's (IOM) Flow Monitoring Surveys and complement it with qualitative insights from focus group discussions with refugees. The quantitative analysis reveals that refugees' preferences for destination countries often change during transit, influenced by factors such as safety concerns, asylum conditions, education, and the presence of relatives at the destination. Our results support the application of bounded rationality and human capital theory, showing that while economic opportunities are important, safety becomes the dominant concern during transit. The qualitative analysis adds depth to these findings, highlighting the role of political…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMigration and Labor Dynamics
MethodsFocus
