On the absence of quantitatively critical measure equivalence couplings
Corentin Correia

TL;DR
This paper investigates the limits of integrability for cocycles in measure equivalence couplings between finitely generated groups, showing that certain critical thresholds are not attainable, thus clarifying the boundaries of existing bounds.
Contribution
It provides a negative answer to the open question about the integrability at critical thresholds, demonstrating that these bounds are not sharp in some cases.
Findings
Critical integrability thresholds cannot be achieved in certain group cocycles.
Explicit examples show the non-attainability of the critical $L^p$ bounds.
The results refine understanding of measure equivalence and cocycle integrability limits.
Abstract
Given a measure equivalence coupling between two finitely generated groups, Delabie, Koivisto, Le Ma\^itre and Tessera have found explicit upper bounds on how integrable the associated cocycles can be. These bounds are optimal in many cases but the integrability of the cocycles with respect to these critical thresholds remained unclear. For instance, a cocycle from to can be for all but not for , and the case was an open question which we answer by the negative. Our main result actually yields much more examples where the integrability threshold given by Delabie-Koivisto-Le Ma\^itre-Tessera Theorems cannot be reached.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSimulation Techniques and Applications
