Multiparty Communication Complexity of Collision Finding
Paul Beame, Michael Whitmeyer

TL;DR
This paper establishes a new lower bound on the communication complexity for collision-finding in multiparty settings, which also implies stronger lower bounds for certain proof systems related to the pigeonhole principle.
Contribution
It introduces a novel lower bound on the k-party communication complexity of collision-finding, improving previous bounds and connecting to proof complexity.
Findings
New lower bound of (n^{1-1/k} log k / 2^k) for collision-finding
Implication of a 2^{n^{1-o(1)}} lower bound on cutting-planes proofs
Improves upon previous lower bounds of 2^{\u221a n}
Abstract
We prove an lower bound on the -party number-in-hand communication complexity of collision-finding. This implies a lower bound on the size of tree-like cutting-planes proofs of the bit pigeonhole principle, a compact and natural propositional encoding of the pigeonhole principle, improving on the best previous lower bound of .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSoftware Reliability and Analysis Research · Optimization and Search Problems · Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
