Correction to: Multivariate CARMA processes, continuous-time state space models and complete regularity of the innovations of the sampled processes, Bernoulli 18, pp. 46-63, 2012
Robert Stelzer

TL;DR
This paper corrects a flaw in previous proofs regarding the equivalence of MCARMA processes and state space models, establishing their canonical representations and properties of the transfer function.
Contribution
It provides a corrected proof showing that MCARMA processes and linear state space models have both controller and observer canonical forms, clarifying their transfer function representations.
Findings
Corrected proof of equivalence between MCARMA and state space models
Established existence of both controller and observer canonical forms
Confirmed transfer function has both left and right matrix fraction representations
Abstract
A serious flaw in the proof of the equivalence of continuous time state space models and MCARMA processes spotted in Fasen and Schenk (2024) is corrected. We point out that likewise an issue in the proof of Theorem 3.2 in Brockwell and Schlemm (2013) can be resolved and, hence, any MCARMA process and linear state space model has both a controller and an observer canonical representation. Equivalently, the transfer function has both a left and right matrix fraction representation.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Statistical Process Monitoring · Advanced Control Systems Optimization · Fault Detection and Control Systems
