Morphisms (should be) everywhere
Attila Egri-Nagy, Mikl\'os Hoffmann

TL;DR
This paper emphasizes the fundamental role of morphisms, or structure-preserving maps, across mathematics and intelligence, proposing a broad framework that distinguishes between dynamic and static morphisms for understanding various fields.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive framework for morphisms, differentiating between dynamic and static types, and highlights their universal applicability beyond mathematics to general intelligence.
Findings
Morphisms are fundamental tools in mathematics and intelligence.
A distinction between dynamic and static morphisms is proposed.
A flexible framework for understanding various fields using morphisms is outlined.
Abstract
Morphisms, structure preserving maps, are everywhere in Mathematics as useful tools for thinking and problem solving, or as objects to study. Here, we argue that the idea of operations being compatible across two domains goes beyond its mathematical use: it is a fundamental mechanism of any intelligence. We precisely define morphisms, distinguish between dynamic morphisms (on operations, binary relations) and static ones (on -ary relations), and describe how a flexible and pluralistic use of morphisms can serve as a general framework for understanding and explanation in a wide variety of fields.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMathematics Education and Teaching Techniques · Topological and Geometric Data Analysis · History and Theory of Mathematics
