Results of the 2023 CommonRoad Motion Planning Competition for Autonomous Vehicles
Niklas Kochdumper, Youran Wang, Johannes Betz, Matthias Althoff

TL;DR
This paper reports the results of the 2023 CommonRoad Motion Planning Competition, comparing various autonomous vehicle motion planning approaches across diverse traffic scenarios based on a standardized benchmark suite.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive comparison of different motion planning methods on a common benchmark, highlighting strengths and weaknesses in safety, efficiency, and rule compliance.
Findings
Identifies top-performing algorithms in various traffic scenarios
Highlights trade-offs between safety and efficiency
Provides insights into the state-of-the-art in autonomous vehicle motion planning
Abstract
In recent years, different approaches for motion planning of autonomous vehicles have been proposed that can handle complex traffic situations. However, these approaches are rarely compared on the same set of benchmarks. To address this issue, we present the results of a large-scale motion planning competition for autonomous vehicles based on the CommonRoad benchmark suite. The benchmark scenarios contain highway and urban environments featuring various types of traffic participants, such as passengers, cars, buses, etc. The solutions are evaluated considering efficiency, safety, comfort, and compliance with a selection of traffic rules. This report summarizes the main results of the competition.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRobotic Path Planning Algorithms · Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety · Transportation and Mobility Innovations
