Knowledge Authoring with Factual English, Rules, and Actions

TL;DR

This paper introduces KALMF and KALMR, extensions of the KALM system, enabling more natural language-based knowledge authoring and reasoning with high accuracy and improved speed, addressing previous limitations in knowledge representation.

Contribution

The paper presents novel extensions KALMF and KALMR that enhance natural language knowledge authoring and reasoning capabilities, with significant accuracy and speed improvements.

Findings

Achieved 95% correctness in fact and query authoring.

Attained 100% correctness in rule authoring.

Realized a 68% reduction in runtime with speed optimizations.

Abstract

Knowledge representation and reasoning systems represent knowledge as collections of facts and rules. KRRs can represent complex concepts and relations, and they can query and manipulate information in sophisticated ways. Unfortunately, the KRR technology has been hindered by the fact that specifying the requisite knowledge requires skills that most domain experts do not have, and professional knowledge engineers are hard to find. Some recent CNL-based approaches, such as the Knowledge Authoring Logic Machine (KALM), have shown to have very high accuracy compared to others, and a natural question is to what extent the CNL restrictions can be lifted. Besides the CNL restrictions, KALM has limitations in terms of the types of knowledge it can represent. To address these issues, we propose an extension of KALM called KALM for Factual Language (KALMF). KALMF uses a neural parser for natural language, MS, to parse what we call factual English sentences, which require little grammar training to use. Building upon KALMF, we propose KALM for Rules and Actions (KALMR), to represent and reason with rules and actions. Furthermore, we identify the reasons behind the slow speed of KALM and make optimizations to address this issue. Our evaluation using multiple benchmarks shows that our approaches achieve a high level of correctness on fact and query authoring (95%) and on rule authoring (100%). When used for authoring and reasoning with actions, our approach achieves more than 99.3% correctness, demonstrating its effectiveness in enabling more sophisticated knowledge representation and reasoning. We also illustrate the logical reasoning capabilities of our approach by drawing attention to the problems faced by the famous AI, ChatGPT. Finally, the evaluation of the newly proposed speed optimization points not only to a 68% runtime improvement but also yields better accuracy of the overall system.