Can ESG Investment and the Implementation of the New Environmental Protection Law Enhance Public Subjective Well-being?
Hambur Wang

TL;DR
This study shows that China's new Environmental Protection Law and increased corporate ESG investments significantly reduce air pollution and enhance public subjective well-being, supporting sustainable development efforts.
Contribution
It provides empirical evidence on the combined effects of environmental legislation and ESG investments on air quality and well-being in China.
Findings
ESG investments reduce air pollution levels
Environmental law implementation improves public well-being
Policies significantly impact sustainable development
Abstract
Air pollution has emerged as a serious challenge for China, posing a threat to public health and hindering the progress of sustainable economic development. In response to air pollution and other environmental issues, the Chinese government introduced a new Environmental Protection Law in 2015. This paper investigates the impact of the new Environmental Protection Law's implementation and corporate Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) investments on air pollution and public subjective well-being. Using panel data at the macro level, we employ a difference-in-differences (DID) model, with Chinese provinces and municipalities as units of analysis, to examine the combined effects of the new Environmental Protection Law and changes in corporate ESG investment intensity. The study evaluates their impacts on air quality and public subjective well-being. Findings indicate that these…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRegional Development and Environment
