CoPrompter: User-Centric Evaluation of LLM Instruction Alignment for Improved Prompt Engineering
Ishika Joshi, Simra Shahid, Shreeya Venneti, Manushree Vasu, Yantao, Zheng, Yunyao Li, Balaji Krishnamurthy, Gromit Yeuk-Yin Chan

TL;DR
CoPrompter is a user-centric framework that enhances the evaluation and refinement of LLM prompt instructions by providing automated criteria generation and an interactive checklist, reducing human effort and improving alignment accuracy.
Contribution
We introduce CoPrompter, a novel system that automates the assessment of LLM response alignment and offers an interactive interface for prompt engineers, streamlining prompt evaluation and refinement.
Findings
Improves identification of instruction misalignment
Helps users understand model failure points
Enhances control over response evaluation
Abstract
Ensuring large language models' (LLMs) responses align with prompt instructions is crucial for application development. Based on our formative study with industry professionals, the alignment requires heavy human involvement and tedious trial-and-error especially when there are many instructions in the prompt. To address these challenges, we introduce CoPrompter, a framework that identifies misalignment based on assessing multiple LLM responses with criteria. It proposes a method to generate evaluation criteria questions derived directly from prompt requirements and an interface to turn these questions into a user-editable checklist. Our user study with industry prompt engineers shows that CoPrompter improves the ability to identify and refine instruction alignment with prompt requirements over traditional methods, helps them understand where and how frequently models fail to follow…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsExperimental Learning in Engineering · Software Testing and Debugging Techniques · Radiation Effects in Electronics
