Filling in Missing FX Implied Volatilities with Uncertainties: Improving VAE-Based Volatility Imputation
Achintya Gopal

TL;DR
This paper enhances VAE-based methods for imputing missing FX implied volatilities by architectural modifications and better uncertainty handling, significantly improving accuracy over prior neural network approaches.
Contribution
It introduces simple architectural improvements and a modified imputation algorithm to better handle uncertainty, outperforming previous VAE methods and classical models.
Findings
Nearly halved error in low missingness regimes
Improved uncertainty estimates for imputed data
VAE modifications outperform prior neural approaches
Abstract
Missing data is a common problem in finance and often requires methods to fill in the gaps, or in other words, imputation. In this work, we focused on the imputation of missing implied volatilities for FX options. Prior work has used variational autoencoders (VAEs), a neural network-based approach, to solve this problem; however, using stronger classical baselines such as Heston with jumps can significantly outperform their results. We show that simple modifications to the architecture of the VAE lead to significant imputation performance improvements (e.g., in low missingness regimes, nearly cutting the error by half), removing the necessity of using -VAEs. Further, we modify the VAE imputation algorithm in order to better handle the uncertainty in data, as well as to obtain accurate uncertainty estimates around imputed values.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStochastic processes and financial applications · Insurance and Financial Risk Management · Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling
