Longitudinal Ensemble Integration for sequential classification with multimodal data
Aviad Susman, Rupak Krishnamurthy, Yan Chak Li, Mohammad Olaimat, Serdar Bozdag, Bino Varghese, Nasim Sheikh-Bahaei, Gaurav Pandey

TL;DR
This paper introduces Longitudinal Ensemble Integration (LEI), a novel framework for multimodal sequential classification, demonstrating superior performance in early dementia detection by effectively integrating diverse longitudinal data over time.
Contribution
The paper presents a new multimodal and longitudinal learning framework, LEI, which improves sequential classification by leveraging intermediate predictions from different data modalities.
Findings
LEI outperforms existing approaches in early dementia detection.
LEI effectively integrates multimodal data over time.
Identifies consistently important features for diagnosis.
Abstract
Effectively modeling multimodal longitudinal data is a pressing need in various application areas, especially biomedicine. Despite this, few approaches exist in the literature for this problem, with most not adequately taking into account the multimodality of the data. In this study, we developed multiple configurations of a novel multimodal and longitudinal learning framework, Longitudinal Ensemble Integration (LEI), for sequential classification. We evaluated LEI's performance, and compared it against existing approaches, for the early detection of dementia, which is among the most studied multimodal sequential classification tasks. LEI outperformed these approaches due to its use of intermediate base predictions arising from the individual data modalities, which enabled their better integration over time. LEI's design also enabled the identification of features that were consistently…
Peer Reviews
Decision·Submitted to ICLR 2025
The paper tries to address a critical problem in biomedicine which can also be extended to other problems where several modalities are used to make inferences. Often these modalities carry information that is locally present hence leveraging information from several modalities to make decisions in a challenging task. The authors introduce LEI to extend EI framework to longitudinal datasets. This makes the motivation clear. The proposed method is also able to identify temporal features that are i
Although the paper is well written and motivated I find the paper lacking with respect to the standards of the conference and the selected primary area. 1. Lacking novelty : I fail to understand the novelty of the paper. The paper seems to be heavily reliant on the Ensemble Integration method and makes several reference of the method throughout the paper. The only separating elements seems to be the use of LSTM. Though the authors have suggested several configuration in which LEI could be used i
Clarity - It is clearly presented.
The following are several concerns that can help further improve the methods and analyses. - Most comparisons were conducted using the authors' proposed methods (Fig. 6), with only three simple baseline methods included in Fig. 7, which is insufficient. Numerous advanced longitudinal data analysis methods are available in the literature that could enhance the comparison. - The reported F-measures are quite low. A straightforward approach, like using the current diagnosis to predict the next time
1. LEI introduces a novel double-weighted loss function to handle class imbalance and ordinal labels. 2. The framework tests four configurations, combining time-dependent and time-distributed base predictors with various classification heads. This allows for optimized multimodal integration and improved handling of complex longitudinal patterns.
1. LEI builds on the previous EI framework but follows an intuitive approach to generating and aggregating base predictors, resulting in limited novelty in its integration method. 2. The evaluation of LEI is constrained, relying solely on the TADPOLE dataset and one primary comparison method (PPAD), which limits the framework's generalizability across diverse datasets. 3. The F-scores achieved by LEI range from 0.32 to 0.42, which are relatively low and may suggest that the problem is not yet we
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAnomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
MethodsBalanced Selection
