Uncertain and Asymmetric Forecasts
Eric Vansteenberghe

TL;DR
This paper develops methods to accurately measure inflation forecast uncertainty and risk directionality by correcting for contamination from expected inflation levels, revealing their true economic implications.
Contribution
It introduces two correction techniques, Normalized Uncertainty and Asymmetry Coherence, to improve the measurement of forecast uncertainty and risk directionality.
Findings
Contamination from expected inflation affects raw measures of uncertainty and asymmetry.
Corrected measures alter economic inferences, such as the significance of inflation effects and policy responses.
Higher moments are only informative when measurement issues are addressed.
Abstract
Measures of inflation uncertainty and directional risk derived from higher moments of forecast distributions are contaminated by the first moment, but in distinct ways. Using individual density forecasts from the ECB Survey of Professional Forecasters, this paper shows that 42% of the variation in raw forecast variance reflects the distance of expected inflation from target, a mechanical level effect, while raw asymmetry is too noisy to identify directional risk without reference to the central forecast. We propose two complementary corrections. Normalized Uncertainty (NU) purges dispersion of its predictable component linked to the policy anchor, recovering genuine belief imprecision. Asymmetry Coherence (AC) extracts directional risk only when asymmetry aligns with the central forecast, formalizing the balance of risks. These corrections alter inference. In a replication of Barro…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComplex Systems and Time Series Analysis · Market Dynamics and Volatility
