Towards Equitable ASD Diagnostics: A Comparative Study of Machine and Deep Learning Models Using Behavioral and Facial Data
Mohammed Aledhari, Mohamed Rahouti, and Ali Alfatemi

TL;DR
This study compares machine learning and deep learning models for ASD diagnosis using behavioral and facial data, highlighting Random Forest's high accuracy and MobileNet's efficiency, with implications for equitable and accessible screening.
Contribution
It demonstrates the effectiveness of Random Forest and MobileNet models in ASD diagnosis, emphasizing their potential to improve accuracy and accessibility, especially for underdiagnosed groups.
Findings
Random Forest achieved 100% validation accuracy.
MobileNet outperformed baseline CNN with 87% accuracy.
Overfitting observed in facial analysis models, requiring further optimization.
Abstract
Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is often underdiagnosed in females due to gender-specific symptom differences overlooked by conventional diagnostics. This study evaluates machine learning models, particularly Random Forest and convolutional neural networks, for enhancing ASD diagnosis through structured data and facial image analysis. Random Forest achieved 100% validation accuracy across datasets, highlighting its ability to manage complex relationships and reduce false negatives, which is crucial for early intervention and addressing gender biases. In image-based analysis, MobileNet outperformed the baseline CNN, achieving 87% accuracy, though a 30% validation loss suggests possible overfitting, requiring further optimization for robustness in clinical settings. Future work will emphasize hyperparameter tuning, regularization, and transfer learning. Integrating behavioral data with…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLaw, AI, and Intellectual Property
