Continuous-Time Analysis of Adaptive Optimization and Normalization
Rhys Gould, Hidenori Tanaka

TL;DR
This paper introduces a continuous-time framework for Adam and AdamW optimizers, providing theoretical insights into their training dynamics, hyperparameter stability, and the implicit effects of normalization layers, leading to a new family of adaptive optimizers.
Contribution
It develops a continuous-time analysis of Adam, derives stable hyperparameter regions, and introduces k-Adam, a generalized optimizer incorporating multiple normalization steps.
Findings
Stable hyperparameter regions for Adam's convergence.
Implicit meta-adaptive effects of normalization layers.
Introduction of the k-Adam optimizer family.
Abstract
Adaptive optimization algorithms, particularly Adam and its variant AdamW, are fundamental components of modern deep learning. However, their training dynamics lack comprehensive theoretical understanding, with limited insight into why common practices -- such as specific hyperparameter choices and normalization layers -- contribute to successful generalization. This work presents a continuous-time formulation of Adam and AdamW, facilitating a tractable analysis of training dynamics that can shed light on such practical questions. We theoretically derive a stable region for Adam's hyperparameters that ensures bounded updates, empirically verifying these predictions by observing unstable exponential parameter growth outside of this stable region. Furthermore, we theoretically justify the success of normalization layers by uncovering an implicit meta-adaptive effect of…
Peer Reviews
Decision·Submitted to ICLR 2025
* The paper proposes a framework to approximate the parameter dynamics of Adam(W), which could be potentially very useful. * This framework can help estimate the stable region of hyperparameters $(\beta, \gamma)$, which can be helpful in practice for hyperparameter selection. * The framework is relatively easy to understand.
- The whole theoretical framework is non-rigorous and based on flawed derivations/assumptions. - I don't understand the crucial deviation in Section C, and it should be put in the main text. - First, why is $m$ differentiable, why can you drop the higher order (second derivative is bounded?) of it? - Second, why is it $g(t_n)$ not $g(t_n - \eta^p)$? In the latter setting, you would need to have an extra term $g'(t_n)$ and an error term $g''(t_n)$? - I think these are crucial que
- The paper is well written and crisp. - Continuous time analysis of Adam is interesting and novel (AFAIK, but I’m not an expert). Since Adam is an important algorithm, any analysis of it can be impactful.
- Assumptions 1 and 2 are not very intuitive, at least not to me. - CIFAR10 results are not very convincing, it’s small scale.
- **Originality:** The authors present a novel and quantitatively precise stability region for Adam's betas in the non-stochastic, continuous-time regime, filling a gap in the literature. While several papers discuss Adam’s performance under stochastic gradients, this work focuses on a deterministic model and provides insights under simplifying assumptions. - **Quality:** The theoretical contributions are sound and grounded in ODE analysis. The derivation of a stability region for Adam is sup
Since there is no predefined space to provide a "General Comment", I provide it here. **Overall Comment:** The paper addresses interesting and mathematically sound questions, but the manuscript quality is lacking in several areas. It needs substantial improvement, and I recommend **rejecting** the paper, with strong encouragement to resubmit once the following issues have been addressed. In particular, I highlight: i) Missing discussion of literature; ii) Missing discussion on contributions:
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques
MethodsAdam · AdamW
