Exponential improvements to the average-case hardness of BosonSampling
Adam Bouland, Ishaun Datta, Bill Fefferman, Felipe Hernandez

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates exponential improvements in the average-case hardness of BosonSampling, advancing the understanding of quantum computational complexity and providing new proof techniques that bypass previous barriers.
Contribution
It proves that estimating output probabilities of BosonSampling is $ ext{ extonehalf} P$-hard with exponentially better bounds and introduces methods to establish average-case sampling hardness without relying on the Permanent-of-Gaussians Conjecture.
Findings
Exponential improvement in hardness bounds for BosonSampling output probability estimation.
First proof of average-case classical sampling hardness for BosonSampling under an anticoncentration conjecture.
New proof techniques that tolerate exponential loss, enabling hardness results without proving PGC.
Abstract
BosonSampling and Random Circuit Sampling are important both as a theoretical tool for separating quantum and classical computation, and as an experimental means of demonstrating quantum speedups. Prior works have shown that average-case hardness of sampling follows from certain unproven conjectures about the hardness of computing output probabilities, such as the Permanent-of-Gaussians Conjecture (PGC), which states that additive-error estimates to the output probability of most random BosonSampling experiments are -hard. Prior works have only shown weaker average-case hardness results that do not imply sampling hardness. Proving these conjectures has become a central question in quantum complexity. In this work, we show that additive-error estimates to output probabilities of most random BosonSampling experiments are…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
