Neuro-Symbolic AI: Explainability, Challenges, and Future Trends
Xin Zhang, Victor S. Sheng

TL;DR
This paper reviews neuro-symbolic AI's explainability by classifying existing studies, analyzing trends, challenges, and proposing future directions to improve transparency and understanding in AI models.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive classification scheme for neuro-symbolic AI explainability and analyzes research trends, challenges, and future research suggestions.
Findings
Classified 191 studies into five explainability categories
Identified key challenges: unified representations and transparency
Proposed future research directions in explainability and ethics
Abstract
Explainability is an essential reason limiting the application of neural networks in many vital fields. Although neuro-symbolic AI hopes to enhance the overall explainability by leveraging the transparency of symbolic learning, the results are less evident than imagined. This article proposes a classification for explainability by considering both model design and behavior of 191 studies from 2013, focusing on neuro-symbolic AI, hoping to inspire scholars who want to understand the explainability of neuro-symbolic AI. Precisely, we classify them into five categories by considering whether the form of bridging the representation differences is readable as their design factor, if there are representation differences between neural networks and symbolic logic learning, and whether a model decision or prediction process is understandable as their behavior factor: implicit intermediate…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) · Machine Learning in Healthcare
