Complexity Theory for Quantum Promise Problems
Nai-Hui Chia, Kai-Min Chung, Tzu-Hsiang Huang, Jhih-Wei Shih

TL;DR
This paper establishes foundational results for various quantum promise complexity classes, revealing surprising differences from classical analogues and advancing understanding in quantum cryptography and property testing.
Contribution
It introduces structural results, complete problems, and separation results for quantum promise classes, and applies these to quantum cryptography and property testing.
Findings
Proves p/mQIP ≠ p/mPSPACE unconditionally.
Shows p/mBQP/qpoly ≠ p/mBQP/poly unconditionally.
Develops secure quantum commitment protocols with statistical hiding.
Abstract
We begin by establishing structural results for several fundamental quantum complexity classes: p/mBQP, p/mQ(C)MA, , p/mQIP, p/mBQP/qpoly, p/mBQP/poly, and p/mPSPACE. This includes identifying complete problems, as well as proving containment and separation results among these classes. Here, p/mC denotes the corresponding quantum promise complexity class with pure (p) or mixed (m) quantum input states for any classical complexity class C. Surprisingly, our findings uncover relationships that diverge from their classical analogues -- specifically, we show unconditionally that p/mQIPp/mPSPACE and p/mBQP/qpolyp/mBQP/poly. This starkly contrasts the classical setting, where QIPPSPACE and separations such as BQP/qpolyBQP/poly are only known relative to oracles. For applications, we address interesting questions in quantum cryptography,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Information and Cryptography
