A note on Diophantine subsets of large fields
Andrew Kwon

TL;DR
This paper proves that in perfect large fields, finite unions of affine translates of infinite proper subfields cannot be diophantine, extending previous results and answering a question posed by Pop.
Contribution
It generalizes a result of Fehm to perfect large fields, showing certain subsets are not diophantine, thus advancing understanding of Diophantine sets in large fields.
Findings
Finite unions of affine translates of infinite proper subfields are not diophantine in perfect large fields.
Generalizes Fehm's result to a broader class of fields.
Answers a question of Pop regarding Diophantine subsets in large fields.
Abstract
Large fields (also called ample, anti-mordellic) generalize many fields of classical interest, such as algebraically closed fields, real-closed fields, and -adic fields. In this note we answer a question of Pop by generalizing a result of Fehm and prove that finite unions of affine translates of infinite proper subfields are never diophantine subsets of perfect large fields.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory
