Precise $^{113}$Cd $\beta$ decay spectral shape measurement and interpretation in terms of possible $g_A$ quenching
I. Bandac, L. Berge, J.M. Calvo-Mozota, P. Carniti, M. Chapellier, F., A. Danevich, T. Dixon, L. Dumoulin, F. Ferri, A. Giuliani, C. Gotti, Ph., Gras, D. L. Helis, L. Imbert, H. Khalife, V. V. Kobychev, J. Kostensalo, P., Loaiza, P. de Marcillac, S. Marnieros

TL;DR
This study precisely measured the highly forbidden $^{113}$Cd beta decay spectrum using a bolometer, comparing it with theoretical models to explore possible quenching of the axial-vector coupling constant and improve understanding of nuclear decay processes.
Contribution
It provides the most precise $^{113}$Cd beta spectrum measurement to date and compares it with multiple nuclear models to investigate $g_A$ quenching effects.
Findings
Measured $^{113}$Cd half-life as approximately 7.73 x 10^{15} years.
Found $g_A^{ ext{eff}}$ between 1.0 and 1.2, indicating possible quenching.
Achieved the lowest energy threshold and best energy resolution for this decay.
Abstract
Highly forbidden decays provide a sensitive test to nuclear models in a regime in which the decay goes through high spin-multipole states, similar to the neutrinoless double- decay process. There are only 3 nuclei (V, Cd, In) which undergo a forbidden non-unique decay. In this work, we compare the experimental Cd spectrum to theoretical spectral shapes in the framework of the spectrum-shape method. We measured with high precision, with the lowest energy threshold and the best energy resolution ever, the spectrum of Cd embedded in a 0.43 kg CdWO crystal, operated over 26 days as a bolometer at low temperature in the Canfranc underground laboratory (Spain). We performed a Bayesian fit of the experimental data to three nuclear models (IBFM-2, MQPM and NSM) allowing the reconstruction of the spectral…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
