Time series and the meaning of quantum non-locality
Alejandro Hnilo

TL;DR
This paper clarifies the meaning of quantum non-locality through a time series approach, showing how Bell's inequalities relate to factual and counter-factual data, and explaining why faster-than-light signaling remains impossible.
Contribution
It introduces a novel time series framework that defines quantum non-locality without relying on traditional notions of Locality and Realism, providing a clearer interpretation.
Findings
Bell's inequalities derived from time series properties.
Violation of Bell's inequalities indicates differences in outcome series when settings change.
Factual and counter-factual data can always be embedded in a classical framework.
Abstract
Quantum non-locality has become a popular term. Yet, its precise meaning, and even its mere existence, is the subject of controversies. The main cause of the controversies is the never ending discussion on the appropriate definitions of Locality and Realism in the derivation of Bell's inequalities. On the other hand, Louis Sica derived Bell's inequalities from the hypothesis that time series of outcomes observed in one station do not change if the setting in the other (distant) station is changed. The derivation is based on arithmetical properties of time series only; it does not involve the definitions of Locality, Realism and probabilities, and is valid for series of any length. An important consequence is that violation of Bell's inequalities implies the series recorded (at the same time) in one station to be different if the setting in the other station is changed. This result gives…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications
