On the unimodality of nearly well-dominated trees
Iain Beaton, Sam Schoonhoven

TL;DR
This paper investigates the unimodality of domination polynomials in trees, disproving the conjecture that all are unimodal and identifying specific conditions under which they are.
Contribution
It demonstrates that not all trees have unimodal domination polynomials and characterizes segments of coefficients, advancing understanding of polynomial behavior in graph theory.
Findings
Not all trees have log-concave domination polynomials.
Identifies segments of coefficients that are non-increasing or non-decreasing.
Shows trees with (T)-m(T)<3 have unimodal domination polynomials.
Abstract
A polynomial is said to be unimodal if its coefficients are non-decreasing and then non-increasing. The domination polynomial of a graph is the generating function of the number of dominating sets of each cardinality in . In \cite{IntroDomPoly2014} Alikhani and Peng conjectured that all domination polynomials are unimodal. In this paper we show that not all trees have log-concave domination polynomial. We also give non-increasing and non-decreasing segments of coefficents in trees. This allows us to show the domination polynomial trees with are unimodal.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Graph Theory Research · Graph theory and applications
