On (dis)agreement between different methods of calculation of the imaginary part of the effective action in expanding space-times
E. T. Akhmedov, I. A. Belkovich, D. V. Diakonov, K. A. Kazarnovskii

TL;DR
This paper compares two methods for calculating the imaginary part of the effective action in expanding space-times, revealing discrepancies in eternal expansion scenarios due to initial and final state wave-functionals.
Contribution
It demonstrates the origin of differences between Bogolyubov and functional integral approaches in calculating effective action imaginary parts in expanding universes.
Findings
Different results from the two methods in eternal expansion cases
Discrepancies linked to initial and final state wave-functionals
Explicit example provided in de Sitter space-time
Abstract
We consider two approaches to calculate imaginary parts of effective actions in expanding space-times. While the first approach uses Bogolyubov coefficients, the second one uses the functional integral or the Feynman propagator. In eternally expanding space-times these two approaches give different answers for the imaginary parts. The origin of the difference can be traced to the presence if the wave-functionals for the initial and final states in the functional integral. We show this explicitly on the example of the expanding Poincare patch of the de Sitter space-time.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEarth Systems and Cosmic Evolution · Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs · Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
