Dissertation: On the Theoretical Foundation of Model Comparison and Evaluation for Recommender System
Dong Li

TL;DR
This paper explores the theoretical foundations of comparing and evaluating recommender systems, emphasizing the importance of rigorous methods for assessing their effectiveness in personalized recommendations.
Contribution
It introduces a formal framework for model comparison and evaluation in recommender systems, addressing gaps in existing methodologies.
Findings
Provides a theoretical basis for model evaluation
Highlights limitations of current evaluation metrics
Suggests new approaches for fair comparison
Abstract
Recommender systems have become increasingly important with the rise of the web as a medium for electronic and business transactions. One of the key drivers of this technology is the ease with which users can provide feedback about their likes and dislikes through simple clicks of a mouse. This feedback is commonly collected in the form of ratings, but can also be inferred from a user's browsing and purchasing history. Recommender systems utilize users' historical data to infer customer interests and provide personalized recommendations. The basic principle of recommendations is that significant dependencies exist between user- and item-centric activity, which can be learned in a data-driven manner to make accurate predictions. Collaborative filtering is one family of recommendation algorithms that uses ratings from multiple users to predict missing ratings or uses binary click…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRecommender Systems and Techniques · Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
