Ungated, plug-and-play preclinical cardiac CEST-MRI using radial FLASH with segmented saturation
Jonah Weigand-Whittier (1), Michael Wendland (2), Bonnie Lam (1), Mark, Velasquez (1), Moriel H. Vandsburger (1) ((1) Department of Bioengineering,, University of California Berkeley, (2) Berkeley Preclinical Imaging Core,, University of California Berkeley)

TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel ungated radial FLASH MRI method for preclinical cardiac CEST imaging that simplifies acquisition, reduces variability, and maintains contrast quality without gating, making it more accessible for researchers.
Contribution
The study presents a segmented saturation radial FLASH MRI technique that eliminates the need for gating in cardiac CEST-MRI, with consistent contrast and reduced measurement variability.
Findings
No significant difference in CEST contrast between gated and ungated methods.
Optimal saturation power identified at 1.8 μT for amide and creatine contrasts.
Ungated acquisition significantly reduces variability in CEST measurements.
Abstract
Purpose: ECG and respiratory-gated preclinical cardiac CEST-MRI acquisitions are difficult due to variable saturation recovery with T1, RF interference in the ECG signal, and offset-to-offset variation in Z-magnetization and cardiac phase introduced by changes in cardiac frequency and trigger delays. Methods: The proposed method consists of segmented saturation modules with radial FLASH readouts and golden angle progression. The segmented saturation blocks drive the system to steady-state, and because center k-space is sampled repeatedly, steady-state saturation dominates contrast during gridding and reconstruction. Ten complete Z-spectra were acquired in healthy mice using both ECG and respiratory-gated, and ungated methods. Z-spectra were also acquired at multiple saturation B1 values to optimize for amide and creatine contrasts. Results: There was no significant difference between…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
