Sound Statistical Model Checking for Probabilities and Expected Rewards (extended version)
Carlos E. Budde, Arnd Hartmanns, Tobias Meggendorfer, Maximilian Weininger, Patrick Wienh\"oft

TL;DR
This paper reviews and improves statistical model checking methods for probabilistic systems, emphasizing soundness and introducing new bounds for expected rewards, validated through experiments.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive overview of sound statistical methods, introduces bounds for expected rewards, and formalizes limit-PAC procedures for practical use.
Findings
Validated sound statistical methods for probabilities and rewards.
Recommended Dvoretzky-Kiefer-Wolfowitz inequality for bounded distributions.
Experimental confirmation of theoretical bounds and procedures.
Abstract
Statistical model checking estimates probabilities and expectations of interest in probabilistic system models by using random simulations. Its results come with statistical guarantees. However, many tools use unsound statistical methods that produce incorrect results more often than they claim. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive overview of tools and their correctness, as well as of sound methods available for estimating probabilities from the literature. For expected rewards, we investigate how to bound the path reward distribution to apply sound statistical methods for bounded distributions, of which we recommend the Dvoretzky-Kiefer-Wolfowitz inequality that has not been used in SMC so far. We prove that even reachability rewards can be bounded in theory, and formalise the concept of limit-PAC procedures for a practical solution. The 'modes' SMC tool implements our methods…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFormal Methods in Verification
