Dust mass in protoplanetary disks with porous dust opacities
Yao Liu, H\'el\`ene Roussel, Hendrik Linz, Min Fang, Sebastian Wolf,, Florian Kirchschlager, Thomas Henning, Haifeng Yang, Fujun Du, Mario Flock, and Hongchi Wang

TL;DR
This study shows that considering porous dust grains in radiative transfer models significantly increases the estimated dust masses in protoplanetary disks, potentially resolving the mass budget problem for planet formation.
Contribution
It introduces a recalibration of dust mass estimates using porous dust opacities, revealing much higher disk masses than previous compact grain models.
Findings
Median dust mass is about 6 times higher with porous grains.
Porous dust opacities lead to lower millimeter fluxes for the same dust mass.
Recalibrated dust masses suggest a better match with exoplanet mass distribution.
Abstract
ALMA surveys have suggested that protoplanetary disks are not massive enough to form the known exoplanet population, under the assumption that the millimeter continuum emission is optically thin. In this work, we investigate how the mass determination is influenced when the porosity of dust grains is considered in radiative transfer models. The results show that disks with porous dust opacities yield similar dust temperature, but systematically lower millimeter fluxes compared to disks incorporating compact dust grains. Moreover, we recalibrate the relation between dust temperature and stellar luminosity for a wide range of stellar parameters, and calculate the dust masses of a large sample of disks using the traditionally analytic approach. The median dust mass from our calculation is about 6 times higher than the literature result, and this is mostly driven by the different opacities…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
