Black hole models and astronomical observations
Serge Parnovsky

TL;DR
This paper compares various black hole models, introduces a new modeling method, and discusses gravitational repulsion near black hole horizons, enhancing understanding of their observational relevance.
Contribution
It presents a simple method for constructing new static non-rotating black hole models and analyzes gravitational repulsion phenomena.
Findings
Differences in model adequacy for astronomical observations
Existence of gravitational repulsion near Bardeen-Kiselev black hole horizons
Introduction of a new modeling approach
Abstract
Some well-known metrics used as models of static non-rotating black holes are considered. These are the Reissner-Nordstrom-de Sitter, Bardeen-Kiselev and McVittie models. A significant difference between them in how adequately they can describe or be the basis for describing observed astronomical objects is demonstrated. A simple method for constructing new models of static non-rotating black holes is presented. It has been shown that a region of gravitational repulsion may exist around the horizon of a Bardeen-Kiselev black hole.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRelativity and Gravitational Theory · Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations · Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
