Practical Evaluation of Wize and Bluetooth 5 Assisted RFID for an Opportunistic Vehicular Scenario
Angel Niebla-Montero, Ivan Froiz-Miguez, Paula Fraga-Lamas, Tiago M., Fernandez-Carames

TL;DR
This paper evaluates Bluetooth 5 and Wize communication technologies for opportunistic RFID systems in vehicular scenarios, focusing on response times and message reliability using low-cost SBCs.
Contribution
It provides a practical comparison of Bluetooth 5 and Wize for opportunistic RFID in vehicular environments, highlighting their performance differences.
Findings
Bluetooth 5 has higher latency (700-950 ms) than Wize (150-370 ms).
Packet loss is lower in Bluetooth 5 (7-27%) compared to Wize (20-52%).
Wize offers faster response times but higher packet loss.
Abstract
Wireless communications are critical in the constantly changing environment of IoT and RFID technologies, where thousands of devices can be deployed across a wide range of scenarios. Whether connecting to cloud servers or local fog/edge devices, maintaining seamless communications is difficult, especially in demanding contexts like industrial warehouses or remote rural areas. Opportunistic networks, when combined with edge devices, provide a possible solution to this challenge. These networks enable IoT devices, particularly mobile devices, to redirect information as it passes via other devices until it reaches an edge node. Using different communication protocols, this paper investigates their effects on response times and total messages received for a opportunistic assisted RFID system. Specifically, this article compares two communications technologies (Bluetooth 5 and Wize) when…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
