The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: The Role of AI Quality Disclosure in Lie Detection
Haimanti Bhattacharya, Subhasish Dugar, Sanchaita Hazra, Bodhisattwa, Prasad Majumder

TL;DR
This study examines how AI quality disclosures influence lie detection, revealing that low-quality AI without transparency impairs judgment, while high-quality AI consistently improves accuracy, highlighting the importance of transparency in AI-assisted deception detection.
Contribution
The paper demonstrates the impact of AI quality disclosures on lie detection accuracy and shows that transparency can mitigate reliance on low-quality AI advisors.
Findings
Low-quality AI without disclosures reduces truth detection accuracy.
Revealing AI effectiveness restores participants' detection abilities.
High-quality AI improves lie detection regardless of disclosures.
Abstract
We investigate how low-quality AI advisors, lacking quality disclosures, can help spread text-based lies while seeming to help people detect lies. Participants in our experiment discern truth from lies by evaluating transcripts from a game show that mimicked deceptive social media exchanges on topics with objective truths. We find that when relying on low-quality advisors without disclosures, participants' truth-detection rates fall below their own abilities, which recovered once the AI's true effectiveness was revealed. Conversely, high-quality advisor enhances truth detection, regardless of disclosure. We discover that participants' expectations about AI capabilities contribute to their undue reliance on opaque, low-quality advisors.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEthics and Social Impacts of AI · Deception detection and forensic psychology · Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
