Notes on $B$-groups
Ilia Ponomarenko, Grigory Ryabov

TL;DR
This paper explores the distinction between B-groups and BS-groups, providing examples of B-groups that are not BS-groups, thereby advancing understanding of their structural properties.
Contribution
It introduces the concept of BS-groups and demonstrates infinitely many B-groups that do not qualify as BS-groups, expanding the classification of these groups.
Findings
Existence of infinitely many B-groups that are not BS-groups.
Analysis of Schur rings reveals stronger properties for certain groups.
Provides new examples differentiating B-groups from BS-groups.
Abstract
Following Wielandt, a finite group is called a -group (Burnside group) if every primitive group containing a regular subgroup isomorphic to is doubly transitive. Using a method of Schur rings, Wielandt proved that every abelian group of composite order which has at least one cyclic Sylow subgroup is a -group. Since then, other infinite families of -groups were found by the same method. A simple analysis of the proofs of these results shows that in all of them a stronger statement was proved for the group under consideration: every primitive Schur ring over is trivial. A finite group possessing the latter property, we call -group (Burnside-Schur group). In the present note, we give infinitely many examples of -groups which are not -groups.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFinite Group Theory Research · Rings, Modules, and Algebras · Geometric and Algebraic Topology
