Quantum Reconstructions as Stepping Stones toward Psi-Doxastic Interpretations?
Philipp Berghofer

TL;DR
This paper explores how quantum reconstruction programs challenge traditional Psi-ontic views and considers Psi-doxastic interpretations as a promising alternative, emphasizing the need for non-factive, experiential reconstructions.
Contribution
It proposes that Psi-doxastic interpretations can be compatible with quantum reconstructions if formulated in non-factive experiential terms, offering a new perspective in quantum foundations.
Findings
Quantum reconstructions challenge Psi-ontic views.
Psi-epistemic interpretations face conceptual and technical challenges.
Psi-doxastic interpretations may align with reconstruction programs if based on non-factive experiences.
Abstract
In quantum foundations, there is growing interest in the program of reconstructing the quantum formalism from clear physical principles. These reconstructions are formulated in an operational framework, deriving the formalism from information-theoretic principles. It has been recognized that this project is in tension with standard Psi-ontic interpretations. This paper presupposes that the quantum reconstruction program (QRP) (i) is a worthwhile project and (ii) puts pressure on Psi-ontic interpretations. Where does this leave us? Prima facie, it seems that Psi-epistemic interpretations perfectly fit the spirit of information-based reconstructions. However, Psi-epistemic interpretations, understood as saying that the wave functions represents one's knowledge about a physical system, recently have been challenged on technical and conceptual grounds. More importantly, for some researchers…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
