ReDAN: An Empirical Study on Remote DoS Attacks against NAT Networks

TL;DR

This paper empirically investigates remote DoS attacks on NAT networks, revealing widespread vulnerabilities that allow attackers to identify NAT devices and disrupt TCP connections, highlighting the need for improved NAT security measures.

Contribution

It provides the first comprehensive empirical analysis of remote DoS attack vulnerabilities in NAT devices and proposes effective countermeasures.

Findings

Over 92% of tested NAT networks are vulnerable to remote DoS attacks.

Identified specific NAT device vulnerabilities across multiple vendors and firmware types.

Proposed countermeasures to mitigate the identified DoS attack vulnerabilities.

Abstract

In this paper, we conduct an empirical study on remote DoS attacks targeting NAT networks. We show that Internet attackers operating outside local NAT networks can remotely identify a NAT device and subsequently terminate TCP connections initiated from the identified NAT device to external servers. Our attack involves two steps. First, we identify NAT devices on the Internet by exploiting inadequacies in the PMTUD mechanism within NAT specifications. This deficiency creates a fundamental side channel that allows Internet attackers to distinguish if a public IPv4 address serves a NAT device or a separate IP host, aiding in the identification of target NAT devices. Second, we launch a remote DoS attack to terminate TCP connections on the identified NAT devices. While recent NAT implementations may include protective measures, such as packet legitimacy validation to prevent malicious manipulations on NAT mappings, we discover that these safeguards are not widely adopted in real world. Consequently, attackers can send crafted packets to deceive NAT devices into erroneously removing innocent TCP connection mappings, thereby disrupting the NATed clients to access remote TCP servers. Our experimental results reveal widespread security vulnerabilities in existing NAT devices. After testing 8 types of router firmware and 30 commercial NAT devices from 14 vendors, we identify vulnerabilities in 6 firmware types and 29 NAT devices. Moreover, our measurements reveal a stark reality: 166 out of 180 (over 92%) tested real-world NAT networks, comprising 90 4G LTE/5G networks, 60 public Wi-Fi networks, and 30 cloud VPS networks, are susceptible to exploitation. We responsibly disclosed the vulnerabilities to affected vendors and received a significant number of acknowledgments. Finally, we propose our countermeasures against the identified DoS attack.