A counterexample to the Conjecture of Ankeny, Artin and Chowla
Andreas Reinhart

TL;DR
This paper presents a counterexample to the longstanding Ankeny-Artin-Chowla Conjecture, which claims that for primes p ≡ 1 mod 4, p does not divide the integer y associated with the fundamental unit in a quadratic field.
Contribution
The paper provides the first explicit counterexample to the conjecture, challenging previously held assumptions in algebraic number theory.
Findings
Counterexample disproves the conjecture
p divides y in the counterexample case
Implications for related number theory conjectures
Abstract
Let be a prime number with , let , let be the fundamental unit of and let and be the unique nonnegative integers with . The Ankeny-Artin-Chowla-Conjecture states that is not a divisor of . In this note, we provide and discuss a counterexample to this conjecture.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMathematics and Applications · Meromorphic and Entire Functions · Geometric and Algebraic Topology
