Enhancing Financial Question Answering with a Multi-Agent Reflection Framework
Sorouralsadat Fatemi, Yuheng Hu

TL;DR
This paper introduces a multi-agent reflection framework that significantly improves financial question answering performance of LLMs by incorporating multiple critic agents for better reasoning and answer evaluation.
Contribution
The study proposes a novel multi-agent framework with multiple critic agents that reflect on reasoning steps, enhancing financial QA accuracy over single-agent systems.
Findings
Performance increased by 15% for LLaMA3-8B
Achieved parity or surpassing larger models like LLaMA3.1-405B and GPT-4o-mini
Slightly below Claude-3.5 Sonnet in some cases
Abstract
While Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown impressive capabilities in numerous Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks, they still struggle with financial question answering (QA), particularly when numerical reasoning is required. Recently, LLM-based multi-agent frameworks have demonstrated remarkable effectiveness in multi-step reasoning, which is crucial for financial QA tasks as it involves extracting relevant information from tables and text and then performing numerical reasoning on the extracted data to infer answers. In this study, we propose a multi-agent framework incorporating a critic agent that reflects on the reasoning steps and final answers for each question. Additionally, we enhance our system by adding multiple critic agents, each focusing on a specific aspect of the answer. Our results indicate that this framework significantly improves performance compared to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
