Not All LLM-Generated Data Are Equal: Rethinking Data Weighting in Text Classification
Hsun-Yu Kuo, Yin-Hsiang Liao, Yu-Chieh Chao, Wei-Yun Ma, Pu-Jen Cheng

TL;DR
This paper introduces weighted-loss methods to improve the use of synthetic LLM-generated data in text classification, emphasizing high-quality data to enhance model performance when real data is limited.
Contribution
It proposes novel weighted-loss techniques that align synthetic data with real-world distributions, improving classification accuracy over standard methods.
Findings
Weighted-loss approaches outperform standard cross-entropy.
Synthetic data quality significantly impacts model performance.
Method is effective across multiple text classification tasks.
Abstract
Synthetic data augmentation via large language models (LLMs) allows researchers to leverage additional training data, thus enhancing the performance of downstream tasks, especially when real-world data is scarce. However, the generated data can deviate from the real-world data, and this misalignment can bring deficient outcomes while applying the trained model to applications. Therefore, we proposed efficient weighted-loss approaches to align synthetic data with real-world distribution by emphasizing high-quality and diversified data generated by LLMs with using merely a little real-world data. We empirically assessed the effectiveness of our method on multiple text classification tasks, and the results showed leveraging our approaches on a BERT-level model robustly outperformed standard cross-entropy and other data weighting approaches, providing potential solutions to effectively…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
Taxonomy
TopicsNatural Language Processing Techniques
MethodsALIGN
