Regularly slice implies once-stably decomposably slice
Joseph Breen

TL;DR
This paper explores the relationship between regular and decomposable Lagrangian cobordisms, establishing implications and distinctions, and introduces new concepts and examples in symplectic topology.
Contribution
It proves that regular sliceness implies once-stably decomposable sliceness and demonstrates that regularity is preserved under satelliting, highlighting differences between regularity and decomposability.
Findings
Regular sliceness implies once-stably decomposable sliceness.
Satelliting preserves the regularity of concordance.
Constructs decomposably slice knots that may not be strongly decomposably slice.
Abstract
We investigate the relationship between regular and decomposable Lagrangian cobordisms in -dimensional symplectizations. First, we show that regular sliceness implies once-stably decomposable sliceness, and offer a stabilization-free strategy. On the other hand, we show that satelliting preserves regularity of concordance, suggesting that regularity and decomposability are distinct in general. Among other results, we compare the symplectic and smooth slice-ribbon conjectures and construct decomposably slice knots that may not be strongly decomposably slice.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Topology and Set Theory · Rings, Modules, and Algebras · Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
