Improved separation between quantum and classical computers for sampling and functional tasks
Simon C. Marshall, Scott Aaronson, Vedran Dunjko

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that certain quantum sampling experiments, if classically simulable, would cause a collapse of the polynomial hierarchy, strengthening the evidence that quantum computers outperform classical ones in specific tasks.
Contribution
It provides new complexity-theoretic results linking quantum sampling problems to the collapse of the polynomial hierarchy, improving upon previous work by considering approximate sampling and postselection.
Findings
Quantum sampling experiments can be approximately simulated classically under certain assumptions.
Classical simulation of these experiments implies a collapse of the polynomial hierarchy to its second level.
A new complexity result relates exact and approximate counting oracles to hierarchy collapse.
Abstract
This paper furthers existing evidence that quantum computers are capable of computations beyond classical computers. Specifically, we strengthen the collapse of the polynomial hierarchy to the second level if: (i) Quantum computers with postselection are as powerful as classical computers with postselection (), (ii) any one of several quantum sampling experiments (, , ) can be approximately performed by a classical computer (contingent on existing assumptions). This last result implies that if any of these experiment's hardness conjectures hold, then quantum computers can implement functions classical computers cannot () unless the polynomial hierarchy collapses to its 2nd level. These results are an improvement over previous work which either achieved a collapse to the third level or…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
