Bootstrap tests for almost goodness-of-fit
Amparo Ba\'illo, Javier C\'arcamo

TL;DR
This paper introduces an 'almost goodness-of-fit' bootstrap test to evaluate if a parametric model adequately represents observed data, allowing for a margin of error, with practical implementation and validation through simulations and real data.
Contribution
The paper proposes a novel bootstrap-based testing procedure for almost goodness-of-fit, accommodating a margin of error and providing flexible, consistent methods for model validation.
Findings
The test effectively assesses model fit within a specified error margin.
Bootstrap schemes are shown to be consistent and easy to implement.
Simulation and real-data results demonstrate the test's practical utility.
Abstract
We introduce the \textit{almost goodness-of-fit} test, a procedure to assess whether a (parametric) model provides a good representation of the probability distribution generating the observed sample. Specifically, given a distribution function and a parametric family , we consider the testing problem \[ H_0: \| F - G(\boldsymbol{\theta}_F) \|_p \geq \epsilon \quad \text{vs} \quad H_1: \| F - G(\boldsymbol{\theta}_F) \|_p < \epsilon, \] where is a margin of error and denotes a representative of within the parametric class. The approximate model is determined via an M-estimator of the parameters. %The objective is the approximate validation of a distribution or an entire parametric family up to a pre-specified threshold value. The methodology also quantifies the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRisk and Safety Analysis
