Convergences and Divergences in the 2024 Judicial Reform in Mexico: A Neural Network Analysis of Transparency, Judicial Autonomy, and Public Acceptance
Carlos Medel-Ram\'irez

TL;DR
This paper employs neural networks to analyze the 2024 Mexican judicial reform, assessing factors like transparency, autonomy, and public acceptance, revealing potential benefits and significant challenges for implementation.
Contribution
It introduces a neural network-based approach to evaluate complex factors influencing judicial reform acceptance and viability in Mexico.
Findings
Reform could enhance judicial autonomy.
Implementation costs pose significant challenges.
Risks of politicization may reduce acceptance.
Abstract
This study utilizes neural networks to evaluate the 2024 judicial reform in Mexico, a proposal designed to overhaul the judicial system by increasing transparency, judicial autonomy, and introducing the popular election of judges. The neural network model analyzes both converging and diverging factors that influence the reforms viability and public acceptance. Key areas of convergence include enhanced transparency and judicial autonomy, which are seen as improvements to the system. However, major points of divergence, such as the high costs of implementation and concerns about the legitimacy of electing judges, pose significant challenges. By integrating variables like transparency, decision quality, judicial independence, and implementation costs, the model predicts levels of public and professional acceptance of the reform. The neural networks multilayered structure allows for the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
