The Galaxy Zoo Catalogs for the Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA) Survey

TL;DR

This paper compares galaxy morphology classifications from Galaxy Zoo across DESI and KiDS surveys, validating the consistency of citizen science data despite imaging differences and demonstrating the potential for transfer learning.

Contribution

It provides a cross-survey validation of Galaxy Zoo classifications, highlighting the impact of imaging quality and confirming the reliability of the Zoobot model for transfer learning.

Findings

Global agreement in classifications with some scatter

Higher smooth galaxy votes in DESI due to shallower imaging

Good agreement with expert visual classifications

Abstract

Galaxy Zoo is an online project to classify morphological features in extra-galactic imaging surveys with public voting. In this paper, we compare the classifications made for two different surveys, the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) imaging survey and a part of the Kilo-Degree Survey (KiDS), in the equatorial fields of the Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA) survey. Our aim is to cross-validate and compare the classifications based on different imaging quality and depth. We find that generally the voting agrees globally but with substantial scatter i.e. substantial differences for individual galaxies. There is a notable higher voting fraction in favor of ``smooth'' galaxies in the DESI+\rev{{\sc zoobot}} classifications, most likely due to the difference between imaging depth. DESI imaging is shallower and slightly lower resolution than KiDS and the Galaxy Zoo images do not reveal details such as disk features \rev{and thus are missed in the {\sc zoobot} training sample}. \rev{We check against expert visual classifications and find good agreement with KiDS-based Galaxy Zoo voting.} We reproduce the results from Porter-Temple+ (2022), on the dependence of stellar mass, star-formation, and specific star-formation on the number of spiral arms. This shows that once corrected for redshift, the DESI Galaxy Zoo and KiDS Galaxy Zoo classifications agree well on population properties. The zoobot cross-validation increases confidence in its ability to compliment Galaxy Zoo classifications and its ability for transfer learning across surveys.