Do Discrete Self-Supervised Representations of Speech Capture Tone Distinctions?
Opeyemi Osakuade, Simon King

TL;DR
This study evaluates whether discrete speech representations from SSL models effectively capture tone distinctions in Mandarin and Yoruba, finding that discretization often loses tone information and should be task-aware.
Contribution
It demonstrates that current discretization methods like k-means may not preserve tone information, highlighting the need for task-aware discretization in tone-sensitive applications.
Findings
Discrete symbols lose significant tone information.
SSL models' latent vectors better preserve tone.
Discretization should be tailored for tone-dependent tasks.
Abstract
Discrete representations of speech, obtained from Self-Supervised Learning (SSL) foundation models, are widely used, especially where there are limited data for the downstream task, such as for a low-resource language. Typically, discretization of speech into a sequence of symbols is achieved by unsupervised clustering of the latents from an SSL model. Our study evaluates whether discrete symbols - found using k-means - adequately capture tone in two example languages, Mandarin and Yoruba. We compare latent vectors with discrete symbols, obtained from HuBERT base, MandarinHuBERT, or XLS-R, for vowel and tone classification. We find that using discrete symbols leads to a substantial loss of tone information, even for language-specialised SSL models. We suggest that discretization needs to be task-aware, particularly for tone-dependent downstream tasks.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSpeech Recognition and Synthesis · Speech and Audio Processing
