On the dimension of $\alpha \beta$-sets
Michael Hochman

TL;DR
This paper proves the tightness of a known lower bound for the box dimension of lphaeta-sets and explores how removing small subsets affects their dimensions, revealing a disparity between box and Assouad dimensions.
Contribution
It establishes the exactness of the Feng-Xiong lower bound and analyzes the impact of small deletions on the dimensions of lphaeta-sets, highlighting differences between box and Assouad dimensions.
Findings
Feng-Xiong lower bound of 1/2 for box dimension is tight.
Removing small positive density sets can reduce box dimension to zero.
Assouad dimension cannot drop below 1/4 despite deletions.
Abstract
We show that the Feng-Xiong lower bound of for the box dimension of -sets is tight. We also study how much of an -orbit ``carries the dimension'': deleting an arbitararily small positive density set of times can cause the box dimension to drop to zero, but the Assouad dimension cannot drop below .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFuzzy and Soft Set Theory · Digital Image Processing Techniques
