Efficient Biological Data Acquisition through Inference Set Design
Ihor Neporozhnii, Julien Roy, Emmanuel Bengio, Jason Hartford

TL;DR
This paper introduces a confidence-based active learning method called inference set design to efficiently select a subset of compounds for biological experiments, reducing costs while maintaining high accuracy.
Contribution
It proposes a novel inference set design approach that selectively acquires labels for the hardest examples to improve overall system performance in biological data acquisition.
Findings
Significant reduction in experimental costs demonstrated.
High system performance maintained with fewer experiments.
Effective on image, molecular datasets, and real-world biological assays.
Abstract
In drug discovery, highly automated high-throughput laboratories are used to screen a large number of compounds in search of effective drugs. These experiments are expensive, so one might hope to reduce their cost by only experimenting on a subset of the compounds, and predicting the outcomes of the remaining experiments. In this work, we model this scenario as a sequential subset selection problem: we aim to select the smallest set of candidates in order to achieve some desired level of accuracy for the system as a whole. Our key observation is that, if there is heterogeneity in the difficulty of the prediction problem across the input space, selectively obtaining the labels for the hardest examples in the acquisition pool will leave only the relatively easy examples to remain in the inference set, leading to better overall system performance. We call this mechanism inference set…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2025 Poster
The described problem is very close to industrial application, and as such quite relevant. The paper is clearly written and quite easy to follow. The experiments are quite detailed.
The machine learning novelty is limited, it describes classical active learning evaluated with a non traditional performance metric. (This metric is however quite well motivated). The argument by the authors, that the benefit of active learning should be interpreted more broadly if the goal is to label the dataset is valid. Using similar argument, however, most of the time the final goal is to maximize (target) or minimize (off-target, tox.) the outcome of the experiment (at least find multiple
The paper is generally well written and easy to follow. The main idea is clear, useful and effective. Good experiments to demonstrate the benefits of the approach.
The technical novelty is limited, as it is mostly an application of existing methods. The paper would benefit from including comparisons with other heuristics that capture the "difficulty" of observations. For molecules, one could think of many ways to heuristically score their complexity, and use this to train on most complex examples first. I think this would be of practical interest to know how much the proposed method can improve over such baselines. The paper appears to have formatting is
The strength of this paper is derived from addressing an interesting real-world challenge in biological screening, where experimental costs are one of the most significant bottleneck. The proposed inference set design method shows somewhat promising potential for these applications by enabling a strategically targeted selection of samples based on model uncertainty. Another strength is the use of diverse real-world datasets, ranging from molecular property prediction (QM9 and Molecules3D) to cel
The most significant weaknesses of this paper are both technical and presentational. First, this paper does not meet basic ICLR submission guidelines, as its length exceeds the 10-page limit, and this paper contains formatting issues, including a large blank space on page 5 and broken text formatting on lines 392-393 of page 8, which diminishes its professional presentation. Secondly, the experimental comparison is severely limited, with only a random agent used as a baseline method. Given the p
Videos
Taxonomy
TopicsGene expression and cancer classification · Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks · Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
MethodsSparse Evolutionary Training
